Username: Password:

Low gas prices or the environment: choose one

Posted by terrapass on June 11, 2007 at 10:12:24 PM

The days get longer. Trees grow heavy with leaves. And politicians yammer about high gas prices. Ah, it must be silly season again.

The goofiness of legislative proposals to lower gas prices is such that normally staid environmental economists foam at the mouth whenever this topic comes up. In an effort keep my own mouth-foaming at a minimum, I’ll present a simple bulleted list of non-controversial (to me) propositions:

  •  Gas prices should be higher, not lower.
  •  No one is “gouging” consumers.
  •  The problem is oil consumption, not oil companies.

This is pretty simple. You can’t simultaneously fight for low gas prices and fight climate change. These are opposing policy objectives. The whole idea behind the various climate change bills presently haunting the halls of congress is to raise the price of energy consumption. Although none of these bills propose a direct tax on gasoline, all of them will lead to an increase in downstream costs for consumers. As they should.

I missed the recent Democratic presidential debate, but apparently Wolf at one point asked the candidates what was to be done about high gas prices. As ever, it fell to a non-contender to provide an honest answer. Mike Gravel came out and said: nothing. High gas prices are a good thing.

Contrast this with John Edwards’ “Plan to Relieve Families from Rising Gas Prices,” a strange mash of policy proposals couched in a healthy dose of demagoguery. To be fair, elements of this plan are sensible -- but only because they have nothing to do with high gas prices. In fact, many of the elements of the plan will raise gas prices.

The only credible way that the government can lower gas prices is by raising fuel economy standards for cars. Mandated efficiency measures will reduce demand for gas, and then the market will do its thing. Of course, the market should eventually do its thing even in the absence of government mandates. Given enough time, Americans will switch to more fuel-efficient vehicles. But only if gas prices remain...wait for it...high.

OK, I think I’m foaming a bit now, so time to wind down. I recognize that high gas prices cause economic pain for many Americans. I also recognize that oil companies make boatloads of money, receive lots of unnecessary government support, and are just generally unlikeable. But none of these facts are the basis for a sound energy policy. Gas prices are high because people really want to consume gas, and any solutions to our energy and environmental problems have to address -- and change -- that fundamental reality. Lowering gas prices is a step backwards.


Post Comment  |   Permalink  |   Email This Article  |   Printer Friendly Version



About TerraBlog
News and views from the global warming frontlines.

Visit TerraBlog

Search this Blog


Top Tags For This Blog
1 sky 80 by 2050 activist advocate advocates air quality al gore alternative energy alternative fuel alternative fuels alternative transportation analysis asian auto industry bali barack obama batteries battery biodiesel biofuel biofuels biomass biorefinery biowaste reclamation book reviews british british columbia btl bush administration california canada canadian cap and trade carbon carbon dioxide carbon neutral carbon neutrality carbon tax carbon trading cellulosic biomass cellulosic ethanol censorship china chinese clean technologies cleantech climate change climate change activism climate change policy climate refuges climate risk climate science coal coal to liquids computer efficiency congress conservancy conservation ctl datacenters demand e85 economic economic growth economy election election 2008 elections electric electrolysis emission reduction emissions energy conservation energy costs energy efficiency energy efficient energy policy energy savings energy spending energystar environmental issues environmental movement environmentalist epa ethanol eu europe european events expert panel eye on china eye on india federal policy financial incentives fiscal fission florida focus the nation fossil fuels france french fuel cell fusion futurism g8 gas prices george bush geothermal german germany ghg global warming government spending green building greenhouse gas gtl hawaii hydro hydrogen hydrogen fuel cell impacted communities incentive incentives india investing investors japan kyoto kyoto protocol leed legislation montana national association of engineers natural gas netherlands new jersey new zealand nuclear ocean energy ontario oregon paris parliament photovoltaic policies policy political politician politicians politics pollution power shift 2007 president presidential race ray kurzweil rebate recycling regulation regulations regulatory renewable renewable energy renewables report research russia russian senate signet solar solar solar energy solar panels solar power state policy step it up study sustainability sustainable sweden tax breaks tax credit tax deduction thermal energy tidal trading uk united kingdom united nations united nations framework convention on climate change warnings from a warming world water conservation white house wind wind energy wind power youth activism
Subscribe
RSS
Google
Yahoo
Newsgator
Netvibes
MSN